Rs of regression coefficients [35]. In the FT011 mechanism of action current sample, none of the VIF values exceeded this limit: VIF values ranged between 1.40 (Escapism) and 2.01 (Self-confidence).PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122866 March 24,3 /Dance Motivation InventoryResults Sample descriptionApproximately two-thirds of the sample (68 ; n = 305) was female. The mean age was 32.8 years (SD = 8.6). The majority of the sample (70 ) had graduate education, 28 had secondary school education, and the remainder (2 ) reported having an education lower than secondary school. Just over one-quarter of the sample (29 ) was still studying at an educational establishment. Just under three-quarters of the sample (72 ) purchase STI-571 worked full-time, 15 were unemployed, and the remainder (13 ) worked part-time or less. Just over one-third of the sample (38 ) was single, 25 were in a relationship, 23 were married or co-habiting, 9 were in a more complicated relationship, and the remainder (5 ) were divorced. In relation to dance experience, 9 of the participants had danced for 12 months or less, 26 for 1? years, 39 for 3? years, and 26 had danced for more than 6 years.Exploratory Factor AnalysesAn exploratory factor analysis was performed with maximum-likelihood estimation and an oblique (Geomin) rotation to evaluate the factor structure of the 51 items on the sample (N = 447). A total of 6- to10-factor solutions were examined. RMSEA values were 0.066 [0.063?.069] Cfit <. 0001 for the six-factor solution; 0.059 [0.056?.062] Cfit <. 001 for the seven-factor solution; 0.055 [0.052?.058], Cfit = 0.005 for the eight-factor solution; 0.050 [0.047?.053] Cfit = 0.475 for nine factors, and finally 0.048 [0.044?.051] Cfit = 0.871 for ten factors. Therefore, the nine-factor solution provided the first adequate (non-significant) Cfit value. Additional model fit indices for the nine-factor solution were also acceptable: 2 = 1807.8 df = 852, p<.001; CFI = 0.915. Of the original 51 items, 29 met the aforementioned criteria for item selection (see Table 1). In the end, Factor 9 included only one item (Item 14), therefore this factor was excluded from further analyses.Labelling of factorsFour items belonged to the first factor (Fitness) as they referred to dancing in order to keep fit and healthy. The second factor (Mood Enhancement) contained three items and referred to the mood improving and energising nature of dancing. The five items belonging to the third factor (Intimacy) referred to the attractiveness of outfits, searching for relationships and sexual partners, and physical closeness to another person. The fourth factor (Socialising) referred to items relating to being in good company and being with like-minded people. The fifth factor (Trance) referred to experiences of trance, ecstasy, floating, and dancing as a way to reach altered state of mind. The sixth factor (Mastery) included motivations that arose from the improvement of coordination, and body movements, as well as increasing control of one's own body. The seventh factor (Self-confidence), contained three items referring to the feeling of sexiness and improved self-esteem. The final factor (Escapism) contained four items that referred to the avoidance of emptiness, bad mood, and everyday problems. All factors have acceptable internal consistencies (see Table 1).Motivational factors: Differences and correlationMood Enhancement scores were significantly higher than the other factor scores (ranging from tintimacy = -36.57 t.Rs of regression coefficients [35]. In the current sample, none of the VIF values exceeded this limit: VIF values ranged between 1.40 (Escapism) and 2.01 (Self-confidence).PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122866 March 24,3 /Dance Motivation InventoryResults Sample descriptionApproximately two-thirds of the sample (68 ; n = 305) was female. The mean age was 32.8 years (SD = 8.6). The majority of the sample (70 ) had graduate education, 28 had secondary school education, and the remainder (2 ) reported having an education lower than secondary school. Just over one-quarter of the sample (29 ) was still studying at an educational establishment. Just under three-quarters of the sample (72 ) worked full-time, 15 were unemployed, and the remainder (13 ) worked part-time or less. Just over one-third of the sample (38 ) was single, 25 were in a relationship, 23 were married or co-habiting, 9 were in a more complicated relationship, and the remainder (5 ) were divorced. In relation to dance experience, 9 of the participants had danced for 12 months or less, 26 for 1? years, 39 for 3? years, and 26 had danced for more than 6 years.Exploratory Factor AnalysesAn exploratory factor analysis was performed with maximum-likelihood estimation and an oblique (Geomin) rotation to evaluate the factor structure of the 51 items on the sample (N = 447). A total of 6- to10-factor solutions were examined. RMSEA values were 0.066 [0.063?.069] Cfit <. 0001 for the six-factor solution; 0.059 [0.056?.062] Cfit <. 001 for the seven-factor solution; 0.055 [0.052?.058], Cfit = 0.005 for the eight-factor solution; 0.050 [0.047?.053] Cfit = 0.475 for nine factors, and finally 0.048 [0.044?.051] Cfit = 0.871 for ten factors. Therefore, the nine-factor solution provided the first adequate (non-significant) Cfit value. Additional model fit indices for the nine-factor solution were also acceptable: 2 = 1807.8 df = 852, p<.001; CFI = 0.915. Of the original 51 items, 29 met the aforementioned criteria for item selection (see Table 1). In the end, Factor 9 included only one item (Item 14), therefore this factor was excluded from further analyses.Labelling of factorsFour items belonged to the first factor (Fitness) as they referred to dancing in order to keep fit and healthy. The second factor (Mood Enhancement) contained three items and referred to the mood improving and energising nature of dancing. The five items belonging to the third factor (Intimacy) referred to the attractiveness of outfits, searching for relationships and sexual partners, and physical closeness to another person. The fourth factor (Socialising) referred to items relating to being in good company and being with like-minded people. The fifth factor (Trance) referred to experiences of trance, ecstasy, floating, and dancing as a way to reach altered state of mind. The sixth factor (Mastery) included motivations that arose from the improvement of coordination, and body movements, as well as increasing control of one's own body. The seventh factor (Self-confidence), contained three items referring to the feeling of sexiness and improved self-esteem. The final factor (Escapism) contained four items that referred to the avoidance of emptiness, bad mood, and everyday problems. All factors have acceptable internal consistencies (see Table 1).Motivational factors: Differences and correlationMood Enhancement scores were significantly higher than the other factor scores (ranging from tintimacy = -36.57 t.